Monday, September 25, 2006

...over land and sea...

Monday 25th September

I received an email from my mate Rob in Doha today. He’s been out there for about six months working for Al-Jazeera on their online English-language news site. We met just before we both went out to Palestine and spent a lot of time there together. He’s been much more involved than me with politics in Britain and as well as squatting has a past in the noble sport of hunt-sabbing and a bunch of anecdotes to go with it. In Israel/Palestine he was a moderating voice: for example he helped me reconsider trying to sabotage the bulldozers and cranes that were used to build the illegal Apartheid wall when I was intent on creeping around in the dark with a screwdriver and a few bags of sugar. I would probably have been shot. We did most of our actions together and kept each other posted on football scores whenever one of us went to an internet café. It is probably no coincidence that it was after he left that I got myself arrested (although we should not downplay the role of the police, who were worse than any soldiers we confronted).

My second arrest abroad occurred on a day when we were trying to get to Tulkarem in the north of the West Bank from the Israeli side. I was with a coach-load of Israeli anarchists and we were turned back so many times that in the end we (well, they, really) decided to give up on trying to get through and instead chose to try a peaceful demonstration in Tel Aviv outside the Foreign Ministry. After lunch and much subsequent delaying, we sat down on a crossing on the road. I was all bravado and went out first and sat down. When I turned around everyone else was sitting in circles with their arms interlocked. Talk about amateur activism. I was forced to try to join a group and settle in even as the police were beating the first bunch of people and dragging them off.

When they got to me, my glasses came off in the (one-sided) struggle and after I was dumped on the pavement I went back to retrieve them. As I did so, one policeman was pulling a female protester off the road by her hair and I said “Oi, that’s a woman.” Was that PC? Discuss. Anyway, he said “Say that again” so I did and he attacked me: knee to the bollocks and punches to the face. It didn’t hurt but I certainly was a bit shocked. Next thing I know there are four of them bundling me into a van and for some reason I was the only one of the six or seven in there to be handcuffed (behind my back). After we were driven to the police station, they got each of us in head locks and rushed us inside. The scum policeman in front of me was punching the anarchist he had headlocked in the face and fortunately for me, my assailant was more interested in kicking out at the same Israeli activist than he was at ruining my good looks (the Israeli suffered a broken nose and was later taken to hospital).

Well, we spent a few hours in the police station. I was interviewed by a guy from Shin Bet, the Israeli secret service, but said nothing. (What the fuck did I know anyway?) Later that night we were transferred to Abu Kabir, apparently the nastiest prison in Israel (unless you are Palestinian, in which case a whole different level of degradation awaits). I was wisecracking all the way and even managed to smuggle my mobile into the cell, which made me popular with the activists I was sharing my disgusting cell with. They still left me in the morning though. I spent another two nights there, the first with robbers who treated me like a hero once they heard my arrest was shown on TV and the second with two Russians who seemed to be trying to intimidate me. After a brief court appearance, I was sent to the comfort of the detention centre.

Anyway, Rob mailed because he wanted me to get 2 mates of his from Australia tickets to the Fulham game next Monday, which I was able to do with a minimum of fuss. Although there are empty seats around us at the Rookery end, only tickets for the Vicarage Road end are sold to the public. Don’t ask me. Rob came with his brother Andy to see Brighton get a point two seasons ago. At the end of the game, when we all met up, I’d primed 8-year-old Joss to say “You were lucky”, which left them a bit gobsmacked. Now they are thirty eight places below us in the league (ha ha). In contrast to the Winder brothers, I think the Aussie couple are actually Watford fans?! Whatever the reason, I was happy to oblige. Our first 3 points...

Saturday, September 23, 2006

"Fugees"

Saturday 23rd September

Wigan v Watford

Wigan is an awful long way away, after all. I didn’t get up till midday and then couldn’t stay up during Sky Sports News after overdoing it a little last night but I was out of bed to hear about Bouazza scoring an equaliser after lots of Watford pressure. One point took us up one place, above Charlton, who lost at Man City today. After Jun and I watched “Children of Men” at the Islington Vue, we got back to watch MoTD. Once again we could have got more from the game, although Wigan might’ve scored 3 in the first half while we’re on the subject of the hypothetical.

"Children of men": I’m always tempted by British films but the backdrop to this - terrorism and the breakdown of societies across the globe - was largely incoherent. Although the main plot was simple enough to follow, there were scenes that didn’t seem to make sense. Set in a police-state Britain in 2027, 18 years after the last human birth, there were illegal refugees in cages all over the shop, like they parachuted into Central London each night. The treatment of the “fugees” should make anyone reflect on how rich contemporary societies dehumanise those experiencing such dire hardship but I’m not sure it will really.

I went to a refugee camp in Bethlehem a couple of years ago. Whenever I heard the term I’d always envisioned temporary structures but the Palestinians have been refugees in their own land for so long that the camps are just like an area of many cities I’ve been to. (Except for the occasional house demolished by the Israeli army and the bullet holes in most walls.) That trip to “the promised land” – a land of promise only because you always think things can’t get much worse – ended with me spendingt 5 days in a detention centre which hosted illegal aliens, though it was a converted three or four star hotel in Nazareth. Six people to a room, yes, but the bathroom was deluxe. Very different from the film and the reality here too.

Last year I was at a protest up at Dungavel, Scotland’s only refugee centre, which is an isolated converted prison where children are held too. People who have fled their own countries to seek asylum here end up locked up in conditions not fit for criminals and committing or attempting suicide. Their crimes? Escaping wars, persecution, poverty. The term for the latter group – economic refugees – is used as though it were self-explanatorily derogatory. People try to make a better life for themselves and their families in a world where information, products, money and the rich move freely across borders but where they cannot and we see them as “bogus” asylum seekers. If the model of globalisation we have were not exacerbating instead of relieving the poverty they attempt to escape, they wouldn’t be here.

Britain’s post-PC response to racism is to codify attacks with references to “asylum seekers” and the ‘successful’ ones, who gain refugee status after endless Home Office hassle, are despised and abused. BNP literature (yes, including The Daily Mail) would have you believe we were outnumbered by foreigners who’ve come to bleed ‘soft touch Britain’ dry and the governments are more than complicit in the shameful targeting of this vulnerable group. Five bills have been enacted since 1993 and they have all been motivated by the desire to make it more difficult for people to be afforded refuge. At least case law has sometimes been successful in limiting some of the more extreme measures of our government, so maybe not ALL lawyers are scum after all.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Football and corruption? Never!

Wednesday 20th September

Well, the football speaking point today is not the fact that Watford failed to beat Accrington Stanley in 120 minutes at Vicarage Road last night (we won 6-5 on penalties) but the Panorama programme on “bungs” in football which focussed on “Big” Sam Allardyce and his agent son. There was nothing even approaching “proof” that corruption had occurred and for that reason you have to say that it was as much a non-issue as the revelation yesterday by the Hungarian PM that his party had lied to the electorate in order to get re-elected or the fact that there exists rivalry between the PM, Chancellor and other ‘senior’ politicians in this country for who will lead the governing Labour Party when the shit-smiling Blair is finally forced out of office and has to accept that his legacy will be dominated with the story of his dogged (note the ‘poodle’ pun) support for a Republican US President with a neo-imperialist agenda.

The game is overrun with money and agents were inevitably going to cream money off the top of fees for players that don’t want/know how to change their own light bulbs. Like with the pointless “war on drugs”, the inevitable conclusion is that a libertarian approach is the best answer. You can no more stop people “touting” their players than you can stop the ungrateful professionals disregarding the club that gave them a chance and going to the latest club with a billionaire backer. Transfer windows and FA codes are irrelevant. Money screams louder than whispers in favour of principles. Did the 80s pass football by? Me thinks not.

“Bungs” was the topic of the day amongst the guys at work (the Gooner Brian was the loudest in condemning the BBC programme, but with George Graham as an ex-manager, what can you expect?) but this evening I was out with some people from my MA at a vegan restaurant in Hackney (Pogo Café) and football hardly got a look-in. I tried to steal the show a bit by revealing to one person after another that I’d just applied for a job in Darfur with the International Organisation for Migration, but nobody cared. So we focussed on a friend who’d just been turned down by Peace Brigades International (PBI) for an accompaniment post in Colombia. Tamsin was offering to go and share her skills (great Spanish, real dedication to human rights) with the people there who could use an international presence and was refused for reasons that are less than transparent.

I am no expert (I know that statement prefaces many an ignorant rant) but should people who want to go and help in situations where human rights are being violated as systematically as in Colombia really be refused because they ask some difficult questions? (OK that was a rhetorical question – you don’t know the details and I’m not getting into them here). My limited experience and the complaints of other lefties around me says that the more “alternative” a group is, the more likely it is to be picky for no discernible reason (this is not news: the "life of Brian" Monty Python sketch about “splitters” indicates that. In Palestine in 2004, I asked a bunch of Israeli occupying soldiers to perform that skit. They refused).

Monday, September 18, 2006

"Super Sunday"

Sunday 17th September

My phone vibrated in my pocket about 7 yesterday evening and I ducked out of view of the one camera that could possibly have seen me so as to read Joss’ text telling me that Watford had drawn 0-0. Later, outside Kings Cross station after getting off a Metropolitan line tube from Wembley Park, I bought a first-edition Observer, which didn’t carry the Watford score but reported that in the game between the two other teams promoted last season, Reading had won 2-1 at Sheffield United, meaning that Watford were off the bottom, though still one of four teams without a win.

There were more games today than yesterday. Today is billed as “Super Sunday” because the big 4 played each other but with two goals in total, someone should contact the “trade descriptions” people: Chelsea beat Liverpool 1-0 despite going down to ten men and Arsenal got a goal near the end of the match at Old Trafford to beat United by the same score and end their winning start to the season. Jun and I watched it in a local (therefore Gooner) pub but I had been willing on Man U to a 2-0 win in order to see Arsenal drop below the Golden Boys in the league. It never happened and I guess it won’t this season. Blackburn also won today, which means that now only the bottom two haven’t won.

I wonder if my poem ever got to Betty..? His mail this week said he’d concentrated on “resilience, resolve, recovery and response” in the preparation for the game. I don’t really understand the last bit but with Villa resurgent after Martin O’Neill’s pre-season appointment as manager and them not having lost a game yet, it was about the result I’d expected. Reports imply that after they dominated the first half, their keeper, Sorensen, won them the point with what is predictably called a “string” of saves. If it goes beyond a particular amount, should it become a “rope”? If so - and this keeps happening - are we gonna be hung by it?

Sunday, September 17, 2006

100 mugs

Saturday 16th September

Did I claim that the filming of “Beat the Nation” had been excruciating? I take it back. That process was slow and painful at times, with close-ups being taken and retaken after each round has been shot and some of the contestants having to repeat their (sometimes mistaken) answers more clearly for the benefit of the microphones. Under hot studio lights and when you are sitting in the same position on a chipboard set for so long, the cumulative effect is mildly annoying.

The same elements multiplied by one hundred contestants and combined with the eleven and a half hours on an uncomfortable set listening to the desperately sleazy warm-up man run through the same ideas (“jokes” would be overextending the terminology) with three different audiences and taken together with the nature of the game itself made today’s filming torturous. I am not twisted, just bitter that in addition to the above and being sat in the very back row in the darkest, furthest corner, my pathetic knowledge of TV & Films was so cruelly exposed.

Behind each of us was a blue square whose light turned red when you got a question wrong and then just extinguished itself. The questions I was forced to sit in the dark after were:

  • In which country was Russell Crowe born?
  • Who is the voice of the racing car “Lightning McQueen” in the film “Cars”?
  • Which comedienne was in a July 2006 episode of Dr Who?
  • In “Wacky Races”, what was the name of the car driven by Luke and Blubber Bear?
  • Who plays Lois Lane in the 2006 film “Superman Returns”?

Dermot O’Leary managed to lead five people through their games over three programmes and only one of them won any money. His triumph was marred by serious accusations of cheating made by at least 3 of his fellow contestants. I saw nothing: I probably had my head in my hands (resting my eyes) at the time that a guy called Madi was said to have gestured (with a classic hand-drawn-across-the-throat) for him not to answer “Billy Holiday” to a particular question about a name-change.

1 versus 100 is a format surely destined for rapid oblivion. With a 20% win rate, it will be a turn-off for the viewer and they’d have trouble filling the 100 contestant seats for any great length of time now that those of us media-whores (I count myself as part of the sad club) who follow the game-show trawler in the hope of being thrown some fish (what the hell did Cantona mean?) have experienced it and given it an almighty thumbs-down.

I sat next to Shirley, veteran of shows such as Strike It Lucky, and next to her was Paul. We managed to have a bit of a laugh in the hours of dead time that we were sitting around, but it was at the end of the night, when the audience and Dermot had gone home that tempers began to fray. The production crew asked us to stay seated but didn’t say why and proceeded to film all of the square-colour-changing sequences again (three shows worth). By this time I was in shouting mode. “Madi, Madi, give us a sign,” I taunted, gesturing as he was supposed to have to embarrassed laughs from those around me.

The floor manager tried to quieten us down as everyone became increasingly restless and told us there was “only one more,” when it was clear to us that we were less than half-way through and unlikely to make the pub. “Liar,” I shouted, several times, as he complained he’d never been heckled before. Finally, we were allowed to leave, filing out to get our bags. As we were ‘checked out’, a member of the production team looked us in the eye, took a white ceramic receptacle from a box and offered it to us: “Mug”?


Thursday, September 14, 2006

A shitty dilemma

Thursday 14th September

I made a statement that I am going to contradict. Yesterday I got a bunch of documents confirming the quiz appearance, which stated that I’d have to be at the studio on Saturday from midday until 10pm. If I go to the quiz there is no way I can see the match. I phoned up last night and said I couldn’t make it but could get there Friday or Sunday. When Michelle phoned me back today, she was trying to convince me to go (so she didn’t have to find a replacement). It was sweet: she kept repeating “We really want you. You’re such a character” just as if someone told her to say that. (They probably added ‘etcetera’, but she couldn’t think of a third line.) A ‘character’? Me? She obviously didn’t see me sneering during the rehearsal. In fact, she wouldn’t recognise me in the street.

At work today my Director Of Studies, Alison, told me there was a Yahoo! quiz online which you could win money from. As it happens, it was no such thing: it was a forum for questions to be posed and answered by other Yahoo! users, though some of them were ‘fact-based’ questions and you could’ve found out the answer more swiftly online. After beating her husband Mick at squash after work, I decided to post my dilemma.

Shall I go to a football match or appear on a TV quiz?

I bought my nephew a season ticket in order to convert him into a Watford fan (he liked Man U) but this Saturday i've been invited to take part in a new quiz show, 1 vs 100. Should I let my 11 y.o. nephew down (Watford v Aston Villa) or blow off the (small) possibility of winning a lot of money?

I got six answers in the first fifteen minutes. Here they are with the user’s name first.

EvilFairie: You can always take him to another game... The opportunity to appear on a quiz show is one in a million. And he’ll probably enjoy the money you are going to win!

One in a million? She hasn’t done her probability homework properly.

Leo: Football. Always Football. Not least because of your nephew!

girl from oz: go to the footy. There are enough boring people on Tv!

This is a valid point but it seems to imply I am boring. How does she know?

knowssignlangauge: well i think you should ask him about it. i would just take him but if you ask him he may tell u to go for it. He is 11 and can tell u weather or not he may think you being on a game show is

pretty cool and see if he can come and watch the game show. well good luck.

Weather? Knowsnotenglishlanguage.

Turd Ferguson: quiz show

thomas a: simple find one to take the kid and you go to the quiz

The last answer is typical of the illiteracy or typos of the net, no? Anyway, I make that 3-3: a score-draw. An important question remains, however: is “turd” his real name?

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Sucking Satan's c*ck

Tuesday 12th September
Lying a couple of inches above this keyboard are £11.50 worth of Tesco vouchers and 14 more offering extra points when I buy a certain something or spend more than a specific amount by a particular date. Tomorrow, on the way back from work, I will drop in at the local branch that conveniently opened a few minutes’ walk from us about eighteen months ago to the delight of some of the people who share our block. I wasn’t that excited by the prospect but have been as loyal a customer as anyone else in this area, I am sure.
I am a hypocrite. I know that the domination of Tesco is bad for the consumer in the long-run and for smaller retailers right now. I have railed against the concept of “convenience” over principles in the past but now I am spending more in Tesco every month than I spend in total on any other retail goods. The supermarket giant now takes more than 30p in every retail pound but probably more like 60p of mine. With the Chapel Market selling fresh veg just a six minute cycle away, how can I justify this? I can’t. I am a hypocrite.
Tim the Hammer - a fan of Bill Hicks - calls it “Sucking Satan’s C*ck” and at the Demo that kicked off this diary/blog, he stood outside while a few of us went into a Tesco Metro on Regent Street to buy sarnies and beer (which Tim had a can or two of – does that mean he swallows too?) In contrast, he still spends at Marks and Spencers, which is avowedly pro-Zionist (and so middle-class). I’ve never been keen on the place: right back when I was growing up, the slightly elder brother of a friend of mine phoned in a bomb-threat to the Watford branch, but then got arrested when he couldn’t help but go and observe the consequences of his hoax call. Returning to the scene of the crime: the mark of the amateur (and the thirteen year-old). Anyway, the point is that from an early age we were aware of Israel’s crimes in occupied Palestine and of Marks’ connection with the country.
The consumer boycott, however, is not really that powerful a tool not only because of the “clear information asymmetry…between corporation and consumer” (Hertz – The Silent Takeover), but also the very nature of the market. Producers still don’t come to consumers in the same way that the reverse is true. We all have our chosen dislikes: I don’t go to Starbucks, buy Coca-Cola or Nike if I can help it but I have no delusions that this will make a difference to anything. Do these companies know I am applying (admittedly limited) principles to the way I allocate my meagre retail budget? I may just as well not be buying something because I don’t like the look or taste.
I am a hypocrite, but a little is better than nothing. Do you suck Satan’s c*ck too? 



I appreciate the irony of - on 31st December 2011 - inserting asterisks into two words in this post in order that I can have the big corporation Google insert ads on my blog which will earn me a few pennies. Weirdly, this post itself is one of the most seen on my blog. I do not think people who googled the terms in the title were looking for an anti-corporate whinge, though.

The probability of success

Tuesday 12th September

I missed a call while playing my fifth game of squash in 8 days yesterday. It was Bianca from 1 vs. 100 and when I rang back she asked me to take part in the filming for the show on Saturday in Wembley. Of course I accepted though I find it difficult to believe that I managed to avoid the pilot and get on the real thing. I wrote about the fake enthusiasm of the audition earlier but didn’t mention that there were a disproportionate amount of entertainment/celebrity questions - Beyonce’s real name, etc. - which is not my strong point at all. The format did allow for some choice of category if you were the ‘1’, though, and so I’ll keep my fingers doubly crossed. Oh, and I’ll try to do a little work on those subjects this week. Name of Britney’s kid, husband, albums and singles. The sort of trivial shit you’d be ashamed to let your mates know you knew (unless it wins you some money).

Bianca didn’t say so, but I have heard the quiz is part of the National Lottery programme on BBC1, and they give out serious money on that. It’ll probably all end in me just getting my expenses for the train (which may mean I’ll be able to go to Watford for the Villa match afterwards at their expense) but the chance to win several thousand pounds is too rare to refuse though I am not sure it is as high as the one percent that the title seems to promise. After all, you have to be chosen first (1% chance) and then beat all the other people. How hard is that?

Still, the chances are significantly better than Fourteen Million to One, though, which is (also) the title of the novel about a stolen winning lottery ticket that a mate of mine has just written under the pen-name Jason Nightingale. You can buy it through Amazon, of course, and it’s published by The Underground Press. One of my squash partners, Hanna, and I both read it (and made suggestions in its earlier phases) and we were pleasantly surprised: it was a real page-turner. (I can probably get you a copy cheap if you don’t mind me taking a small cut.) I’ve promised “Jason” that I’ll plug the book if I get the chance on the show (if Dermot O’Leary lets me).

I also filled in and out a Weakest Link application form today that I will send off later. The difficulty will be getting on, I’m sure, but the probability of winning if you do get to stand opposite the cosmetically-enhanced ginger one is significantly higher. With only 9 contestants, it is – ceterus paribus – more than10% but you’ve got to allow for the dumbfucks who answer “Which UK country…?” questions with “Paris”, as well as those who ‘pass’ when they mean ‘bank’. All in all, my chances of winning on that show are closer to 25%, I’d modestly say.

OK, I’m not recovering.

It's the foreign policy, stupid

Monday 11th September

Let me be the first to tell you: today is the 5th anniversary of the terrorist attacks on the U.S. which killed five times fewer than the war in Afghanistan and about, what?, fifty? a hundred? times fewer than in Iraq so far. There is this emphasis on knowing exactly where you were when you heard the planes hit. Why? Does it matter where the TV you saw it on was unless it was in one of the WTC towers? September 12th at my school there were still students who hadn’t heard. I know where they were when I told them but who cares, really?

I enjoy the conspiracy theories around the events that killed nearly 3,000. Obviously I don’t believe that we have been told the whole truth about those events. On the 12th, five years ago, I even proffered the opinion that there may have been spooks on the planes waiting for the right moment to take the terrorists out but not realising that the planes were going to become bombs. However, such a view now is at the very mildest end of those that believe something is being hidden. New Statesman this week published an article in which the MI5 whistle-blower David Shayler opines that there were NO PLANES on September 11 2001…

Now, the argument that a missile hit the Pentagon has been out there for a few years though there is photographic evidence (www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm) of plane parts at the site. Given the size of the hole in the wall, the lack of damage inside the offices and the lack of any video of the plane, that argument is at least understandable though I have met a handful of people who consider it fact to the extent that they look at me like a poor deluded fool for thinking otherwise. However, Shayler argues that what hit the twin towers “were missiles surrounded by holograms made to look like planes”. I am sorry, mate, but you have lost it. The events of that day were enough to make all of us a little unsound in judgement (and did your sex drive go up too for a while? I know I was fucking for England) but puh-lease...

The war-mongering liars in the US administration and the UK government used the events to attack our liberties and go after long-desired targets. Illegal weapons have been used in Iraq, thousands massacred in Fallujah and detention without trial and torture have become acceptable practice. In the light of these disgusting facts, it is perhaps understandable that there is some belief that the terrorist attacks may have been orchestrated by US neo-conservatives (no love lost for liberal New York…). This is often backed up by the line from the Project for the New American Century’s report Rebuilding America’s Defenses:Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor.”

To dismiss such theories with the epithet “conspiracy” is lazy. Shayler’s argument may be laugh-out-loud ridiculous but it is self-evidently true that there are powerful people conspiring to shape events so that they best may profit. Put these words in order: always there been have and always be will there. However, to draw lines backwards through time in order to make sense of events, make them fit a neat explanation (though in the face of so much scientific and eyewitness evidence, controlled demolition and holograms aren’t that neat an explanation), is merely the attempt of the human mind to impose order on the unrelated, much in the same way that we talk about a life story as though one event led inevitably to another.

About ten times, I joined the trudges through grey central London streets that we called “marches” against the Iraq war though we all knew it was a done deal even if there was no agreement on what the motive was supposed to be. While Blair was talking about WMD here, Bush was playing on the ridiculous idea of a Saddam connection with the events of five years ago (oh, and the fact that a couple of Iraqi agents were sent to assassinate his daddy in Kuwait). The war was obviously immoral and against the spirit of Resolution 1441, but I’d have to disagree with Kofi Annan and say that it wasn’t indisputably illegal. Although I hated the smug apologist for tens of thousands of deaths, Christopher Greenwood QC’s ‘golden thread’ argument linking the resolution back to Resolutions 678 and 687 is convincing enough in legal terms. No wonder lawyers are so widely despised.

Perhaps it is not incontrovertibly illegal but the Iraq war is certainly directly related to the attacks on London of 14 months ago. Blair trying to claim the carnage on the London Underground had nothing to do with the invasion and subsequent bloodbath there is as ridiculous as Bush’s explanations for 11/9/01 (that “they” hate the freedom the US has). The actions abroad of these Security Council members and their unrelenting support of dodgy Middle Eastern regimes and Israel despite its criminal occupation of Palestine and ongoing Apartheid policies are what it’s all about. It’s true that Bin Laden and his henchmen hate Western society and that they would never allow people the freedom we still have here despite the best attempts of our own governments to curtail elements of it. However, the chestnut question is: why didn’t they attack Switzerland, South Africa or Costa Rica if it is freedom they hate so much? It’s the foreign policy, stupid.

Can fate really be tempted?

Saturday 9th September

Watford won more points on their travels than at the Vic last season on the way to the play-offs. They need to reproduce that away form if they are to stay up this year but at the moment we have symmetry: one draw and one defeat both at home and on the road.

Sunday 10th September

I wrote those two sentences yesterday and turned off the computer to finish packing my squash gear before meeting John (who I’d already told on the phone that we’d drawn) for our second ever game. As I did, Phil Thompson, who was watching the game for Sky Sports News, said that there’d been a 95th minute penalty awarded at the Reebok. No? It was to Bolton. Noooooo. They converted it on a day when the Premiership saw 4 saved penalties. Noooooooooooo. Symmetry deserted me. Watford lost 1-0 and with one point from four games are now propping up the division like a corpse in a flyover.

Malky Mckay hit the crossbar in the game that was his Premiership debut after being promoted twice (Norwich 2004, West Ham 2005) and subsequently sold before the new season began. Francis hit the post and Young also the crossbar to leave their manager, Sam Allardyce (whose name, like the racist Ron Atkinson’s, is usually prefixed with ‘big’), saying they were fortunate and didn’t deserve the three points. In the Observer Matt Rowson, who was co-founder of the excellent Blind, Stupid and Desperate on-line Watford fanzine which changed its status to ‘archive’ with its closure last month, “wonders if we have the quality to stay up”.

What the fuck is fate? Am I supposed to have tempted it by writing about symmetry before the whistle blew? Is fate not something that is certain to occur? If so, how can such inevitability be tempted? What the fuck is fate? Is my team a passive object of the workings of something preordained by some power that we do not easily perceive? Or are those wearing the golden shirts able to influence this force: to choose their own destiny?

Fuck fate. Unsurprisingly, I don’t believe in any form of preordination. I am an atheist, not persuaded by mystical limits on my own agency. Destiny, however, as I understand it, is something you can shape. With destiny, you are the active subject. If those heads go down, destiny becomes fatal, but it is never fate. With that in mind, I decided to send an email to yourvoice@watfordfc.com.

hi, i am the recipient of Aidy's emails every week and just thought i'd return the favour. I know he's widely-read and thought i'd send him this poem, which has something of the indomitable spirit i think he is trying to inspire in the Golden Boys.

Invictus (unconquered) by W.E. Henley:

Out of the night that covers me,
Black as the Pit from pole to pole,
I thank whatever gods may be
For my unconquerable soul.

In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.

Beyond this place of wrath and tears
Looms but the Horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.

It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll,
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.

The Golden Boys can do it. Come on!

After all, I don’t want this unrequited love to be wholly one-sided. For my part, I will court (not stalk).

With Aston Villa home next, Wigan away after that and then Fulham home again, our first three points cannot be so far away. Fuck fate. I will tempt it again, though the notion of doing so is philosophically ridiculous. If they believe in themselves, Watford will stay up.

Drowning sorrows

Friday 8th September

“You are your brother’s bitch,” I hope someone is singing that tomorrow at the Reebok now that they’ve got Anelka: the petulant vagabond whose agent-sibling is portrayed as unsettling him in order to continue creaming transfer fees for his own benefit. Me? I will have one ear on Sky Sports News again. No 1 vs. 100 pilot for me, no away game yet this season either. Thinking my first ‘travelling’ of the season will be up the road to Ashburton Grove on 14th October if I can get us tickets. The following two games are in London too, so I will be trying to make it three in a row. Despite that, I am going to have to miss our home match against Accrington Stanley in the Carling Cup because it clashes with my first evening back teaching at Westminster. A long CC run could mean dilemmas on a Tuesday, but I’ll play it by ear.

Three games, three goals and one point so far, Watford are 18th in the table. Betty has consequently played with various collocations of the word learn: “learning curve”, “learning environment”, “lessons learned”. This is very much in tune with his image as a teacher-coach – he is unlikely to be the ‘hairdryer’ type. Progress in top-flight football is what it’s all about now and if the “’Orns” can notch up three points away we can, I’m sure, drag ourselves out of the bottom three and the prospect (in 35 games time) of an immediate return to the Championship.

Last time round in the Premiership, 1999/2000, we only one won away game (at Anfield) and finished bottom of the table with a then record lowest points tally of 24 (thanks Sunderland for taking that record from us). The five teams we beat at home were Coventry, Sheffield Wednesday, Bradford, Southampton (who all finished in the bottom 7 and none of whom are in the Premiership now) and Chelsea (hurrah). So, maybe it’s with those statistics in mind that the club announced today that they’d bought the freehold of the pub opposite the ground – the Red Lion.

Can sorrow really be drowned? Alcohol doesn’t dissolve depression but it should be easier to come to terms with defeat in the company of others. On the other hand, beer and company before a match are more likely to lead to a rise in expectations and therefore the possibility of greater disappointment. Still, this should all be tempered by the essence of masculinity. After all – in theory – men are supposed to be the more rational of the sexes, the less prone to uncontrollable emotion. “In theory.”

After England’s 2-1 defeat to Brazil in the humid heat of Shizuoka four years ago, I saw my first bit of hassle involving English fans (I’d stopped a big Japanese guy hitting a smaller one at the post-Argie celebrations on the streets of Susukino, Sapporo). I didn’t see the thing start and thankfully no fists were raised, but three pissed (in the UK and US senses) English men, older than me, were pushing and abusing a TV journalist from the States (“Why are you here? How many people in your country are watching this?”). His cameraman should’ve been filming but didn’t seem to be and the England troublemakers just walked off after venting a little anger.

No big deal: it hardly counts as hooliganism but what sort of man defines himself through the vagaries of a team’s (mis)fortunes such that he’d lose it in this way? Seneca said “Most powerful is he who has himself in his own power”. The fragile maleness that is threatened by the defeat in sport of 11 other men is not the sort of masculinity that a “man” should be proud of. Failure should be something to strengthen us through an examination of our weaknesses. We need never stop learning.

Ghost town

Monday 4th September
Back to work after 2 weeks off, I found an article, “Ghost trains to Watford” by David Mckie from the Guardian, in my drawer. I guessed it was put there by Peter, the elder statesman of our TEFL school and when he arrived in his odd socks just before nine he confirmed it. As well as being a first call of reference about the language, he’s a definite ‘phone a friend’. Beyond that, Peter has a mild case of English eccentricity. Not one of those you see in magazines who are so obsessed by bulldogs that they have posters and inflatables in their sheds but in a drier more understated perhaps old-fashioned way. Even eccentricities modernise.
The article talks about the station usage figures published by the Office of Railway Regulation and talks about Watford West, the stairways to platforms on Tolpits Lane that somehow qualifies as a station (rather than a ‘stop’) that I pass to and from Kerry’s. Apparently figures say 25 passengers used it last year despite the fact that it’s been closed for 10 years and only the platforms can be made out amongst the greenery that reclaimed this unused space. Mckie is funny: what has become of the 51 people who’ve used this station in the last 2 years? Was there a Hertfordshire Circe (look it up, I did) or “Were they perhaps lured by the promised delights of west [he doesn’t capitalise here, humph] Watford on to some phantom train that then carried them off to captivity?”
The delights of West Watford? This is where I come in. I was born and grew up in a terraced house at 239 Harwoods Road, which links the main West Watford A-roads, next to the corner shop I did paper-rounds for and just across the road from the (now-demolished) buildings of my infants and junior schools, named after Chater, the do-gooder son of a town centre chemist at the turn of the twentieth century. I am still good friends with one of my mates from that school, Idris. He lived about a third of the way up the 7 minute walk to the stadium when I was a ten year-old and is now about half way between Watford West station and my sister Kerry’s place.
The Metropolitan line station (Watford) was slightly closer to our Harwoods Road house and was the one I used for day-trips to London (change at Baker Street) when I was trying to broaden my small-town horizons in my teens. I think I only ever used the Watford West station, which is on the border of the council-built Hollywell, for a crafty toke, and that after it was closed but before it was cage-gated: 1999 to be exact. The difference in the residential areas closest to the stations says much about the rich and poor of an old market town. The Met line stops next to Cassiobury Park, next to which the Earl of Essex had one of his homes, which later gave way to the Cassiobury Estate, all detached and semi-detached middle-England homeland. This is where Terri (my eldest sister) lives with her husband Matt and children Jake and Teigan.
Heading west from the uninvited greenery of Watford West is Croxley Green, the end of the line, about half way to my (now demolished) senior school. The other way, what’s left of the tracks snake east then north through Watford Stadium Station and Watford High Street Station and on to the Junction. The stadium station was built during the early to mid-80s when hooliganism was in vogue and in red-tops and the idea of fencing in people who’d paid to be entertained and rat-running them in one direction seemed perfectly reasonable.
Six stations and others without “Watford” in the name but with our dialling code: so much to be proud of. But the real delights of West Watford, where do I start?
Oh, I’ve finished.

Blue and green are the colours

Sunday 3rd September

My friend Tish, who I met on the MA I have finally finished with the handing in on Friday of my dissertation, has a converted ex-police launch with a tractor’s engine moored up in Hampton and she arranged a cruise down to Windsor for this weekend (England v Andorra so Watford aren’t playing) so that I could go. I came back so relaxed I could hardly speak. Got a bit of a tan too.

It ain’t central London: England on that stretch of the Thames. Willows to the horizon and the sky at some points, almost. People out in all manner of boats doing sports I can’t properly distinguish between (though I know the difference between skiffing and rowing now, thanks to Tish). Hotel boats, party cruises, houseboats and narrow boats and Dutch barges and a hundred moored-up motor boars outside beautiful large homes and gardens. The castle at the end of it, like the apex of the pyramid of privilege (except it was a winding river).

The royals. I remember the looks I got in Japan at the England end when I chanted “Our German Queen fucks Greeks”. Even if football is one of the new religions, Betty II still has divine status with some England fans, like she was personally responsible for 1966 and all that. John, Emma, Ben and I sang “Sven Go-ran Eriksson, Sven Go-ran Eriksson, for president” instead of the national anthem. Sack them all. Make us a republic and redistribute the land fairly. Modern fucking Britain? You must be joking. Aristocrats own more than a million acres, raking it in from farming, forestry, mining (what’s left) and plenty more besides. We’ll have some of that, thank-you.

Anyway, the trip was fun. As well as a little driving each, we tied up at locks, gradually improving our lassoing styles. At Romney Lock on Saturday, one of the lock-keepers shouted over: “Is that where you sit, then?” I was wearing my red Watford t-shirt, with “The Rookery” on the back, the name of the stand at the Vic, and so we chatted football. I told him I took Joss and he said he’s been going for 27 years (I think) and takes his sons. He sits 14 rows behind us and told me he buys 3 season tickets one in from the aisle so that if he wants to buy another ticket, he knows that place is likely to be free: you’d have to be ‘sad’ to go alone, he says. Clever guy, sort of bought an option along with his adult and 2 children seats. Value for premiership money, why not? The downside was that I undoubtedly went down in the opinion of this lock-keeper, though I rose vertically about four foot as the lock filled, as he figured me for the fair-weather-fan I didn’t have the chance to admit to not-being-ashamed of being.

Come on guys: though I started off the chant “Guildford, Guildford, give us a song” when Man U were 2-1 up and their fans were quiet, the reality is that it’s business all the way now, and even if loyalty can’t usually be bought in clubs like mine, Watford don’t need me or the lock-keeper, though they want us to think they do and they enjoy the attention. To some (mostly men), this unrequited love is their lifelong and perhaps only passion. (Shankly put it better.) Not for me. ‘Perspective,’ Shanks. Have a word.

First Two Games

Saturday 19th August

Everton v Watford

So, I think, what with my evident lack of commitment to keeping a diary, amongst other reasons, that I should call these pieces ‘fair weather fan’. Nobody else replied to my mail and so I just sent off for Silver Memberships for Joss and myself (like, not level 2 at all, but level four out of five (after two different platinumns and gold)). Also, I didn’t go to any of the pre-season friendlies, culminating in a 1-1 draw with Inter and a 2-1 win over Chievo Verona, both at the Vic. Today was Watford’s first game in the Premiership for 7 years and I didn’t go. Never really thought about going either, despite at one point thinking about trying to publish this…

Watford’s first ever game in the First Division was against Everton and we won 2-0. My granddad, who’d been in Mount Vernon Hospital for a couple of weeks, died in the morning, but my dad still took me and my younger brother, Trevor, to the game at 3pm. It was 1982. I was 12. Trevor was 9. It was my mother’s father who died. Jim - as we called him - hadn’t lasted 9 months after his wife, nanny - as we called her, Mary, as he did – died on the morning of New Year’s Day. My mum had lost both parents. Trevor and I didn’t go to the funerals.

I didn’t go to today’s game either. Sat at home and spent a lot of time pretending to be doing my dissertation (on The Global Justice Movements and Human Rights, since you ask) but really making various excuses to sit in front of Sky Sports News (at least, normally, with an old copy of New Internationalist in my hand, scanning it for mentions of human rights). It is only Sky Sports News and Sky One that I get on my cable TV. Fortunately for my relationship with Jun, I dislike Murdoch and his transnational right-wing tax dodging corporation too much to pay (directly at least) for anything he profits from. We got a ninetieth minute goal but had already let in two.

I watched highlights later on Match of the Day. One of the two goals was from a penalty awarded for handball after the ball hit Chris Powell (summer signing from Charlton) smack-bang on the forehead. We played well. it was even said that we didn’t deserve to lose. Gotta say it: we wuz robbed.

Tuesday 22nd August

Watford v West Ham

I said I'd be at Kerry's by 6 but get there at 6.45 and my elder sister makes quiche and potatoes and salad. I ask Joss whether he’s going to shout. I have taken him to fifteen games or so in the last four years. This is my main role as uncle. I take my nephews (and maybe a niece one day) to football if they want to go. So far only 3 of the 7 or 9 have taken me up on it. Kerry’s boyfriend Phil offers us the five minute lift to Vicarage Road, which is, unsurprisingly, one of the oldest roads in Watford and led from Watford Church by what is now the High Street down to a few hundred metres away from where Kerry lives on the Hollywell. Watford’s stadium takes its name from the road that no longer quite meets the church, truncated as it was by the ring-road whose construction meant the exhumation of 15 sets of remains.

Joss got involved with all the singing, even to one he didn’t know. I had to show him Aidy Boothroyd’s name in the programme (£3 each) so that he could articulate a little better the next time it came round. We still chorus “Come on you ‘orns” - which is an imperative not a statement of intent - and “We love you Watford, we do” while “Yellow Army” is perhaps over-used but, fortunately, suits my shouting style. Of course I’m mostly a pacifist though I’ve got the YELLOW ARMY mug in yellow on a camouflage-style green background. So: I own 8 mugs, will buy a couple more this year to balance the six (one got smashed about three years ago) from the late 70s and 80s. Tiny bit nerdish, I accept.

To our right and one row in front on the other side of the aisle is a curly haired guy I have seen before from higher up in the stand. He is the type who turns around when singing to gee up the crowd; Watford need more fans like him. The woman sitting directly behind him, however, is not impressed and asks him to stay in his seat. He is fairly restrained in his reply, but when she doesn’t accept what he says, starts off a “Stand up if you love Watford” chant, which is the final word on the subject. I decline to stand, not because she has a right to ask him to sit but because I don’t want to rub her defeat in. Later Curly starts a few good chants and continually ribs the goalie “Caroll, why’ve you got a girl’s name?”, which Joss particularly enjoys.

We are in The Rookery row CC, 3 from the front, seats 103 and 104 – just to the right of the goal as we look at it. We should be in the background of a fair bit of footage this year. Will have to wear my teddy-bear coat (over a shirt?). Joss wore the shirt that I bought him last year. I might buy him a new one (with the 1881 – 2006, “125 years” legend) on Saturday before the match, but I don’t want one with the sponsor on it. I’ve got two shirts: one from 2001, when my nephew Luke came over from Ireland, and we sat in the Rous stand for a few games before he asked to move to the Rookery, where I’ve been ever since, and one retro one (78/79 season, when I started going with my dad) that I bought just before the playoff final. They are both made in the UK, but I have got a red Rookery T-shirt I bought there that was made in Bangladesh. I want to make sure they aren’t sweatshop labour before I buy another. Watford is ‘the family club’ after all. Nobody wants to be wearing something a child has made or a mother who works in the sort of conditions you could read about for the workers on Nike goods.

I never had a shirt as a kid: don’t think it was that common then. I had a few scarves, and of course my mugs (oh, and I’ve still got my moneybox, though it got chipped (after 25 years) last year when Joss and Kerry stayed for the summer (they call it the blame game)).That’s too many brackets for one sentence, or perhaps for one writing style.

After sustained first-half pressure that saw us hit the post but otherwise never really threatened, Watford’s Marlon King scores first, in the second half, with a curling shot from about 30 yards out but we concede within a minute and a half (or so). Concentration. More pressure from us especially, but the game ends 1-1. Next to the aisle, we move as soon as the whistle sounds. On the way out of the stand, Joss says it’s been ages since the last game. The play-off final, he is talking about.

Thursday 24th August

Pardew has (more or less) said we deserved to win. Moyes (less or more) said we didn’t deserve to lose. Boothroyd, in the first of his weekly emails for the season, has said we didn’t deserve anything other than what we got because we didn’t take our chances and we made mistakes. Good bloody point, Betty. Hope you are as clear-sighted throughout the season.

Yesterday I played a colleague, Paul, at squash and as we sat in the pub after he beat me he told me of ‘a spot the difference’ competition in The Guardian earlier in the week: a picture of Chris Powell’s head next to one of his hand. Paul also quoted them referring to us as a ‘gentle’ club. Watch out Premiership big boys, gentle Watford are your next opponents.

Friday 25th August

I’m on a roll: two entries in consecutive days. Well, actually it’s Saturday 1.20 am, but I haven’t been to bed and that’s what counts. Got a phone call today that’s left me with a hypothetical dilemma and that’s excuse enough to go on about myself a bit. Bear with me, it’ll get to Watford.

Had a day off work a few weeks ago to go to an audition for a new quiz show, 1 versus 100, produced by the same company that did the two other auditions I’ve been to, for Beat the Nation and then Deal or No Deal. They were all different but similar and I got onto Beat the Nation and should have cut my losses then.

I am the sort of person who wants to go on TV shows and win money. I should accept this fact so that I can begin to deal with it. Do they have a group for it?

The answer is yes, and it meets whenever someone commissions an idea they buy from someone else who represents someone who saw something similar-ish and changed it a bit and added a couple of things and then has all the money from exclusive rights over the idea less a bit of commission, all of which is paid for by adverts, licence fee or premium rate phone calls See, I know all about it… At both of the last two, the seating was in rows in a hall and I sat by myself. At the first we were round the largest table I’ve ever been at and so I sat between two people. I can’t even remember - three years later - what sex they were.

It’s uncomfortable for me. Not for everyone, though. People really have a good time: what seems like genuine laughter at the main guy’s jokes, enthusiasm for each of the activities we are asked to do, passion when being interviewed on camera. At the 1 versus 100 audition in a SOAS building a 4 minute cycle ride from our Kings Cross flat, there were groups of people who knew each other from Deal or No Deal and others who recognised some of them from the same programme: “How much did you win?”. One woman in front of me as we sat waiting to give a (non-prepared, in my case) interview answered something in the region of forty five or forty seven thousand pounds. She’s still on the circuit.

C.J., who I vaguely recognised from the hundreds of hours I’ve dedicated sitting on my arse in front of TV, and who’s now on Eggheads, was at the same audition in Shepherds Bush for Beat the Nation. Cocky fucker. In a general knowledge raise-your-hands activity he got more questions right than anyone and had to be asked to stop answering so they could judge the rest of us. Another activity was a tell-us-3-things-about-yourself-and-make-at-least-one-of-them-a-lie-and-then-see-if-people-can-work-out-what’s-true-and-what’s-not activity. I was the only one who swore as part of my statement. Sometimes I think I don’t really fit in with polite company well. Anyway, leaving, C.J. (as I know him now) and I were waiting ahead of the pack at the lift to go down. I tried to make small talk and he condescended. Tut, tut.

This is getting long, innit? I’m gonna cut to the Watford related thing and then maybe write a bit more about my game-show auditions, applications and appearance. That way you can just go from after the football bit to tomorrow’s entry about the Man U at home game, if you want to...

‘Bianca’ rang me and asked whether I’d be available to take part in a pilot (she told me what that was, like I hadn’t seen Pulp Fiction) and that my expenses for my train journey to Wembley would be paid. 9th September (Bolton away). She said it wouldn’t rule me out of getting onto the show when it was filmed. OK, I agreed. Reckon I can live without the Bolton game. Then she told me that filming for the show proper is the following weekend, 15th-17th. We play Aston Villa at home, Sat 16th 5.15 - must be on Sky. I can’t miss the home game, though, especially now I am trying to come to terms with my irrational interest in winning money on game shows. I will put my foot down. I can live with ‘fair weather fan’, ‘never-bloody-goes fan’ is not good.

That was your cue. Jump ahead to tomorrow (ok, later today, pedant) if you want footie chat. I’ve done the whole related-to-football thing. Now I’m back on my Endemol experiences. This is not so much a diary as a memoir until I do a bit more supporting and a bit less drinking and smoking and then turning the computer on. Let’s start at the very beginning, as Maria said. I saw an ad in Metro classifieds (I’m an English teacher in London, I’m always looking) that invited emails to apply to be on a new quiz show. An application form embellished and a few weeks later I was at the audition and some time after that I got a call asking me to go to Nottingham to take part in the show. No black T-shirts.

Jun didn’t come: wasn’t allowed to come to the studio. I went up on a Thursday night, was put up in a hotel and given a taxi-ride there on Friday morning. Green Room: curly sandwiches and my opponents. Watch a pilot: get the idea. Make up: I am told how good my skin is.

Cue game. Foundational idea: questions score points correlating to the percentage of British people who don’t know the answer. Three rounds that each whittle down the number by one and a final against the clock (and the nation). I beat my opponents but don’t beat the nation. I have to come back. People who ‘lost’ and subsequently left won £100. I have won nothing. Go home and come back for the same routine Sunday night and first thing Monday morning with exactly the same result. By this time, I’ve almost managed banter with Tim Brooke Taylor. Finally, in my third show, I am beaten in the third round and get a question right to leave with a hundred pounds. I have lost more than that in wages and it was excruciating.

I didn’t learn my lesson. When I got an email inviting me to apply for a new show that didn’t appear to include trivia, I convinced myself Dare or No Dare was a sort of British Fear Factor. I was well up for it. It was only at the audition that I realised I’d been getting the name wrong despite the number of forms I’d filled in. It wasn’t about ‘daring’ at all. Anyway, I can’t remember much about the interview but the enthusiasm required for the activity (spinning a piece of card) was out of all proportion to its appeal. They never got back to me about that one.

I still hadn’t learned my lesson. But: I will not go the pilot and I will only go to the filming for the show if it doesn’t clash with the Villa match. I am recovering.

Criminals and Cheats

Watford v Manchester United

Saturday 26th August

The logistics of my travel: about 4 minutes to Euston on the bike. 20 mins on the train and 15 mins cycle to Kerry’s. Have a small bottle of beer and chew the fat with sis and Phil. Kerry offers to cook for me after the game and I take her up on it. I confirm Joss’ favourite team is Watford (conversion complete?) and talk down our chances. After two games, Man U’ve scored 8 and let in 1. We’ve got 1 point. We leave at 2, and on the walk to the ground, which takes about 30 mins with Joss, I stop to use the cashpoint at the shops on Tolpits Lane. Waiting behind a guy on his mobile, I notice Joss’ dad coming over. I guess that he’s seen us through his window and decided to come out. ‘Doggy’ and I shake hands and exchange pleasantries, it’s the first time I’ve seen him since before the trial, which I didn’t go to. He was at the funeral in May though, of course.

The cashpoint is the only one on the Hollywell, as far as I know. Each of the people who live in this less-than-wealthy area are charged for the privilege of accessing their own money, another “screw you” to us from the type who balk at the interest rates they charge on their own credit cards or laugh at us for buying the “crap” jewellery they flog in their shops. I’m slightly annoyed with myself for not using a cashpoint earlier, but that feeling is subordinated to the contempt I feel for those behind my ‘stolen’ £1.50.

The three of us walk together for a couple of minutes until we are opposite the local, the Highwayman. After we take our leave he calls me back so Joss can’t hear what he wants to say about the trial. I tell him Jun said he’d done a good job. He’s smiling as he crosses the road and goes into the pub. Joss and I walk on, turning right into Hagden Lane, chatting football again. Joss says he’ll be happy if we score. I agree. The queue at the turnstiles is as bad at this time as ever but we get in about half two and see the teams warming up. We’ve never done that before: always last-minute it.

Back in May 1985, I saw Watford beat United 5-1 at the Vic at the end of the season on the way to a mid-table finish. Back in those days, money hadn’t clicked that sport was one of the new religions and Watford had climbed from the old Fourth Division to the First between 1977/78 and 1982/83 under Graham Taylor. The following season we made the FA Cup Final. Jun ribs me about living in the past and I am aware that the ‘Nostalgia is dangerous’ sloganned T-shirt I wore as a message to England fans in Japan should really be a lesson for me to learn. After all, the game’s saturated now and it can never go back.

There are many consequences of billions of pounds in football: both positive and negative. The effect on the players as people, however, probably comes under the latter. Chants like Curly’s “Rohypnol Ronaldo” are a reminder that young millionaires expect to get what they want. (OK, it is also largely due to the fact that we haven’t played Man U much since 1985, and certainly not since those rape accusations, wholly unfounded in every single unproven case involving the spoilt young rich undereducated overpaid macho footballers, no doubt).

Ahem.

Curly was also on to Rio Ferdinand’s missed drugs test and subsequent ban. All it needs is a new team to come up every season with fans who haven’t played Man U since before 2003 and he’ll never be allowed to forget it (which he was at the time…). Now, I don’t know about Rio, but the fact is that performance-enhancing drugs are used in sports and it would be exceptionally naïve to think that English football was somehow exempt. Top Premiership players might play 50 or 60 games in a season and there are ways of assisting them to do that. Cheating exists in a number of guises in society and in the game, too. ‘Professional fouls’ and ‘diving’ are two of the most obvious to the fan, but the money and influence that has led to Juventus’ demotion in Italy, and the steroids flowing through the veins of English players are less tangible to a crowd of 20,000. That does not make them less real. Indeed, they have a far greater corrosive effect on the sport.

Curly, for his part, seemed to think the whole affair made Rio a cokehead. From there, it only needed the connection to the Pinocchio nose of the goalie, Van der Saar, and the permutations multiplied enough for us to live up to Betty’s call to make the Vic a “hostile” environment. Curly’s liberal use of the word ‘cunt’ at the end of many of the insults helps form the environment at the front within shouting distance of their strikers in the first half and their goalie and defenders in the second. “Marlon says you’re a cunt” is one of his faves.

But it wasn’t us, it was the Golden Boys. They went one down early and a second looked possible but Ashley Young went past the scorer of their goal, Silvestre, on the right and crossed for Damien Francis to knock it in for his second of the season. Richard Lee made an excellent save low to his left to keep us in it but in the second half Darius Henderson gets some weird connection on what should have been a tap in and the ball crosses the goal in front of us past two other Watford players. A minute and a half later, a bad back pass, Giggs is in and they are 2-1 up. We are back on our feet: Yellow Army! Yellow Army! The game played out that way, though, and they are 3 wins out of 3 and top. We are slipping down but we’ve played 3 of last season’s top-ten teams and we’ve played well enough. Not beautiful, but pacy and committed. I think our concentration in defence straight after good chances is a problem.

We let the crush go this time and walked back out the further exit in order to go into the Watford Shop. I was on a mug thing, even bought one I didn’t really like. I got Joss a football that needs some air but he didn’t seem to want a shirt (maybe he was just being polite). Then we walked back and talked about the game and tried to guess where we’d be in the table. Joss is still in his summer holidays before he starts senior school in early Sep. Kerry lives in a cul-de-sac and Joss knows all the kids around and spends most days playing outside with his friends. I’m getting nostalgic.

After pasta, salad and garlic bread and a couple more beers, I cycle back to the station and get on a train for Euston. Sit next to a guy who tells me he lives in London but works in a barber’s in Watford and ‘cuts’ a couple of the Watford players. We talk a bit about our chances this year and I tell him with the authority of someone who has seen 2 games (talking to someone who hasn’t seen any) that we can stay up. Fake it till you make it...

Great Football Cliches

Saturday 19th August

Everton v Watford

So, I think, what with my evident lack of commitment to keeping a diary, amongst other reasons, that I should call these pieces ‘fair weather fan’. Nobody else replied to my mail and so I just sent off for Silver Memberships for Joss and myself (like, not level 2 at all, but level four out of five (after two different platinumns and gold)). Also, I didn’t go to any of the pre-season friendlies, culminating in a 1-1 draw with Inter and a 2-1 win over Chievo Verona, both at the Vic. Today was Watford’s first game in the Premiership for 7 years and I didn’t go. Never really thought about going either, despite at one point thinking about trying to publish this…

Watford’s first ever game in the First Division was against Everton and we won 2-0. My granddad, who’d been in Mount Vernon Hospital for a couple of weeks, died in the morning, but my dad still took me and my younger brother, Trevor, to the game at 3pm. It was 1982. I was 12. Trevor was 9. It was my mother’s father who died. Jim - as we called him - hadn’t lasted 9 months after his wife, nanny - as we called her, Mary, as he did – died on the morning of New Year’s Day. My mum had lost both parents. Trevor and I didn’t go to the funerals.

I didn’t go to today’s game either. Sat at home and spent a lot of time pretending to be doing my dissertation (on The Global Justice Movements and Human Rights, since you ask) but really making various excuses to sit in front of Sky Sports News (at least, normally, with an old copy of New Internationalist in my hand, scanning it for mentions of human rights). It is only Sky Sports News and Sky One that I get on my cable TV. Fortunately for my relationship with Jun, I dislike Murdoch and his transnational right-wing tax dodging corporation too much to pay (directly at least) for anything he profits from. We got a ninetieth minute goal but had already let in two.

I watched it later on Match of the Day. One of the two goals was from a penalty awarded for handball after the ball hit Chris Powell (summer signing from Charlton) smack-bang on the forehead. Gotta say it: we wuz robbed. Oh, and if this is ever read by anyone, well done to you travelling fans.